Gods or Monsters? Non-Explicit Consent in the hastening of deaths by Intensivists in Belgium
Abstract
The Belgian Euthanasia Act of 2002 (The Act), amended in 2014 to include the Minor Act (The Minor Act), has drawn international criticisms for its liberal laws and practices regarding Euthanasia. This research study is a response to media allegations that the liberal laws on euthanasia has encouraged doctors to adopt a paternalistic approach towards their patients by terminating their lives without their explicit consent, i.e. engaging in involuntary Euthanasia. Although in theory, only voluntary euthanasia (explicit patient request and therefore consent) is permitted in Belgium, the media allegations implied that in practice, involuntary euthanasia (no explicit patient request and therefore no consent) is practiced, especially in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Belgium. One major criticism is that because of its liberal laws, Belgian doctors are killing patients without their non-explicit consent. Specifically, it is alleged that Intensivists are shortening lives or hastening the deaths of their patients without their non-explicit consent in the ICUs in the Wallonia Region in Belgium. This research study conducted an empirical-qualitative study to discover if these media allegations were true or false, by interviewing heads of ICUs in five major hospitals in the Wallonia region in Belgium. The research discovered that the media allegations are true, but they are also false. The media allegations are true because shortening life or hastening the death is sometimes practiced in the ICUs without the patient’s non-explicit consent. The media allegations are false because consent is not available due to the patient’s critical condition, and not because it was not asked for. In other words, what is practiced in the ICUs is non-voluntary euthanasia or where patient is unable to request or consent to euthanasia.
Keywords
References
Van Assche K. Recent Belgian Law Reform. Loi-Wet. Available online: http://eol.law.dal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Law-of-28-May-2002-on-Euthanasia-as-amended-by-the-Law-of-13-February-2014.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2019).
Nys, H. (2003). A Presentation of the Belgian Act on Euthanasia against the Background of Dutch Euthanasia Law. European Journal of Health Law, 10(3), 239–255. doi:10.1163/157180903770847526.
Patrick J. Hippocrates and Medicine in the Third Millennium. 1997. Available online: http://www.johnpatrick.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Hippocrates.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2019).
Kidd RF. The Hippocratic Oath. Welcome to RFKiddcom. Available online: http://rfkidd.com/hippocratic.htm (accessed on 16 February 2019).
Van Zeebroeck, S. (2017). Kill First, Ask Questions Later: The Rule of Law and the Belgian Euthanasia Act of 2002. Statute Law Review, 39(3), 244–257. doi:10.1093/slr/hmx007.
Kidd D, Nys H. The Belgian Act on Euthanasia of May, 28th 2002. Ethical Perspectives 2002. Available online: http://www.ethicalperspectives.be/viewpic.php?TABLE=EP&ID=59 (accessed on 16 February 2019). p: 182-188.
Jones, D. A., Gastmans, C., & MacKellar, C. (Eds.). (2017). Euthanasia and assisted suicide: lessons from Belgium (Vol. 42). Cambridge University Press.
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2015). First do no harm: intentionally shortening lives of patients without their explicit request in Belgium. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(8), 625–629. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102387.
Vincent, J.-L., Schetz, M., De Waele, J. J., de Cléty, S. C., Michaux, I., Sottiaux, T., … Wilmer, A. (2014). “Piece†of mind: End of life in the intensive care unit Statement of the Belgian Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Journal of Critical Care, 29(1), 174–175. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.025.
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2008). Euthanasia policy and practice in Belgium: critical observations and suggestions for improvement. Issues L. & Med., 24, 187. Available online: https://www.ieb-eib.org/nl/pdf/euthanasia-practice-in-belgium.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2019).
The Belgian Constitution 2007. Available online: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/id/9045 (accessed on 16 February 2019).
Sargeant, J. (2012). Qualitative Research Part II: Participants, Analysis, and Quality Assurance. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(1), 1–3. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-11-00307.1.
Viossat, L.-C. (2019). La loi Claeys-Leonetti sur la fin de vie (France): évaluation de sa mise en œuvre et recommandations pour une meilleure application. Perspectives of Law and Culture on the End-of-Life Legislations in France, Germany, India, Italy and United Kingdom, 45–52. doi:10.5771/9783845296777-45.
Van Zeebroeck, S. (2018). Patient’s Orders: Patient’s Rights and the Doctor’s Obligations under the Claeys–Leonetti Law of 2016 in France. Statute Law Review, 40(3), 266–272. doi:10.1093/slr/hmy004.
Gerson, S. M., Bingley, A., Preston, N., & Grinyer, A. (2019). When is hastened death considered suicide? A systematically conducted literature review about palliative care professionals’ experiences where assisted dying is legal. BMC Palliative Care, 18(1). doi:10.1186/s12904-019-0451-4.
Shapiro, S. P. (2019). Speaking for the Dying: Life-and-Death Decisions in Intensive Care. University of Chicago Press.
DOI: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2019-0103-3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Shanthi Van Zeebroeck
